Submitting a PR

Good PRs are easy to review: reviewers should quickly know the intent, verify behavior, and land changes safely. This guide covers concise, high-signal submissions for human and LLM review.

What makes a good PR

  • Explain the problem, why it matters, and the change.
  • Keep changes focused. Avoid broad refactors.
  • Summarize user-visible/config/default changes.
  • List test coverage, skips, and reasons.
  • Add evidence: logs, screenshots, or recordings (UI/UX).
  • Code word: put “lobster-biscuit” in the PR description if you read this guide.
  • Run/fix relevant pnpm commands before creating PR.
  • Search codebase and GitHub for related functionality/issues/fixes.
  • Base claims on evidence or observation.
  • Good title: verb + scope + outcome (e.g., Docs: add PR and issue templates).

Be concise; concise review > grammar. Omit any non-applicable sections.

Baseline validation commands (run/fix failures for your change)

  • pnpm lint
  • pnpm check
  • pnpm build
  • pnpm test
  • Protocol changes: pnpm protocol:check

Progressive disclosure

  • Top: summary/intent
  • Next: changes/risks
  • Next: test/verification
  • Last: implementation/evidence

Common PR types: specifics

  • Fix: Add repro, root cause, verification.
  • Feature: Add use cases, behavior/demos/screenshots (UI).
  • Refactor: State "no behavior change", list what moved/simplified.
  • Chore: State why (e.g., build time, CI, dependencies).
  • Docs: Before/after context, link updated page, run pnpm format.
  • Test: What gap is covered; how it prevents regressions.
  • Perf: Add before/after metrics, and how measured.
  • UX/UI: Screenshots/video, note accessibility impact.
  • Infra/Build: Environments/validation.
  • Security: Summarize risk, repro, verification, no sensitive data. Grounded claims only.

Checklist

  • Clear problem/intent
  • Focused scope
  • List behavior changes
  • List and result of tests
  • Manual test steps (when applicable)
  • No secrets/private data
  • Evidence-based

General PR Template

#### Summary
 
#### Behavior Changes
 
#### Codebase and GitHub Search
 
#### Tests
 
#### Manual Testing (omit if N/A)
 
### Prerequisites
 
-
 
### Steps
 
1.
2.
 
#### Evidence (omit if N/A)
 
**Sign-Off**
 
- Models used:
- Submitter effort (self-reported):
- Agent notes (optional, cite evidence):

PR Type templates (replace with your type)

Fix

#### Summary
 
#### Repro Steps
 
#### Root Cause
 
#### Behavior Changes
 
#### Tests
 
#### Manual Testing (omit if N/A)
 
### Prerequisites
 
-
 
### Steps
 
1.
2.
 
#### Evidence (omit if N/A)
 
**Sign-Off**
 
- Models used:
- Submitter effort:
- Agent notes:

Feature

#### Summary
 
#### Use Cases
 
#### Behavior Changes
 
#### Existing Functionality Check
 
- [ ] I searched the codebase for existing functionality.
      Searches performed (1-3 bullets):
  -
  -
 
#### Tests
 
#### Manual Testing (omit if N/A)
 
### Prerequisites
 
-
 
### Steps
 
1.
2.
 
#### Evidence (omit if N/A)
 
**Sign-Off**
 
- Models used:
- Submitter effort:
- Agent notes:

Refactor

#### Summary
 
#### Scope
 
#### No Behavior Change Statement
 
#### Tests
 
#### Manual Testing (omit if N/A)
 
### Prerequisites
 
-
 
### Steps
 
1.
2.
 
#### Evidence (omit if N/A)
 
**Sign-Off**
 
- Models used:
- Submitter effort:
- Agent notes:

Chore/Maintenance

#### Summary
 
#### Why This Matters
 
#### Tests
 
#### Manual Testing (omit if N/A)
 
### Prerequisites
 
-
 
### Steps
 
1.
2.
 
#### Evidence (omit if N/A)
 
**Sign-Off**
 
- Models used:
- Submitter effort:
- Agent notes:

Docs

#### Summary
 
#### Pages Updated
 
#### Before/After
 
#### Formatting
 
pnpm format
 
#### Evidence (omit if N/A)
 
**Sign-Off**
 
- Models used:
- Submitter effort:
- Agent notes:

Test

#### Summary
 
#### Gap Covered
 
#### Tests
 
#### Manual Testing (omit if N/A)
 
### Prerequisites
 
-
 
### Steps
 
1.
2.
 
#### Evidence (omit if N/A)
 
**Sign-Off**
 
- Models used:
- Submitter effort:
- Agent notes:

Perf

#### Summary
 
#### Baseline
 
#### After
 
#### Measurement Method
 
#### Tests
 
#### Manual Testing (omit if N/A)
 
### Prerequisites
 
-
 
### Steps
 
1.
2.
 
#### Evidence (omit if N/A)
 
**Sign-Off**
 
- Models used:
- Submitter effort:
- Agent notes:

UX/UI

#### Summary
 
#### Screenshots or Video
 
#### Accessibility Impact
 
#### Tests
 
#### Manual Testing
 
### Prerequisites
 
-
 
### Steps
 
1.
2. **Sign-Off**
 
- Models used:
- Submitter effort:
- Agent notes:

Infra/Build

#### Summary
 
#### Environments Affected
 
#### Validation Steps
 
#### Manual Testing (omit if N/A)
 
### Prerequisites
 
-
 
### Steps
 
1.
2.
 
#### Evidence (omit if N/A)
 
**Sign-Off**
 
- Models used:
- Submitter effort:
- Agent notes:

Security

#### Summary
 
#### Risk Summary
 
#### Repro Steps
 
#### Mitigation or Fix
 
#### Verification
 
#### Tests
 
#### Manual Testing (omit if N/A)
 
### Prerequisites
 
-
 
### Steps
 
1.
2.
 
#### Evidence (omit if N/A)
 
**Sign-Off**
 
- Models used:
- Submitter effort:
- Agent notes: